Allison the Writer vs. Phyllis Reynolds Naylor: The “Glass Bubble”

In my research for my previous post about Newbery Medals, I read a highly thought-provoking quote from Phyllis Reynolds Naylor, the author if ‘Shiloh’ and the ‘Alice’ books, both of which I strongly denounce (in the context of “antonym of ‘recommend'”, courtesy of the thesaurus).

When confronted in an interview with some alleged concerns towards the amount of profanity in her book Shiloh, (as opposed to the atrocious grammar, both written and “spoken”,) author Phyllis Reynolds Naylor commented, “There are people in the world who speak crudely … You can’t put your child in a glass bubble and protect him always.”

My response, twenty-one years later: Indeed, you (probably) can’t shelter a child forever, but who are you, Phyllis Reynolds Naylor, to determine between the ages nine and twelve is the right time to quit sheltering all kids cold turkey?

I can just see it now:



MRS. PERKINS — a middle-aged, conservatively-dressed woman — enters the kitchen holding her purse, some groceries, and a small paperback book.  Let’s call it The Greater Prowess of Lucy, a book that is infamous for being banned (let’s say for legitimate reasons) all over the United Provinces of Atlantica by educational institutions.  SUSIE PERKINS, age ten, is sitting at the kitchen table, reading Little Log Cabin in the Countryside.  She looks up excitedly at her mother’s entrance.

The Little Log Cabin series is practically the only series her mother permits her to read.  The critically-acclaimed Franny Crewe mystery series considered too inappropriate in their household, because Franny dates Fred for purposes other than marriage prospects.


Hi, Susie.  I bought a book for you and I figured you might enjoy it.

MRS. PERKINS hands her daughter The Greater Prowess of Lucy with almost undetectable hesitance.

Of course, MRS. PERKINS doesn’t know if her daughter will like it at all, but after attending last week’s author talk at the library, she feels it is her parental duty to expose SUSIE to this book’s contents now so that SUSIE is more up to speed with her classmates at school.

SUSIE accepts the book reluctantly, and places a bookmark within her well-worn copy of Little Log Cabin, intending to return to it up later.


Thanks, Mom.

SUSIE begins to read while her mother puts the groceries away.  Time passes and SUSIE is halfway through the book.

Abruptly, SUSIE stands up, gasping in horror.  Her chair clatters to the floor behind her.  She covers her mouth with one hand and her face is green.


(Worriedly,) Susie?  What’s wrong?

SUSIE doesn’t respond.  She runs to the bathroom and slams the door.  From inside, we hear sounds of vomiting.

MRS. PERKINS places her hands on her face, shocked.


Oh, dear….  Maybe that wasn’t such a wise idea after all.


My belief is that every child is unique, and every responsible parent who knows their child should be responsible for determining at what age their child is exposed to certain things, and just how much.

For example, here are some questions for parents:

Is it normal and proper to call over your five year old out of the blue to have a heart-to-heart talk about puberty?

Would you let your five year old learn to read their first words from a tabloid magazine?  (After all, tabloids have plenty of easy three- and four-letter words….)

Would you let your five year old watch Jurassic Park if they get tired of watching Barney all the time?

If you answered “Of course not — they’re not ready to handle that!” to any of the above, you have more sense than Ms. Reynolds Naylor seems to have had in April, 1993.

There are some things that a parent may expose their child gradually, like things that come with age, or scarier movies that they probably won’t be able to handle at more tender ages without getting nightmares, and there are some things that they may choose to never expose their children to, ever, and I can think of several things that would apply to that last category.  If you’re a conservative parent of a child who shares these conservative values, and you happen to believe that profanity is inappropriate, then what right do authors like Phyllis Reynolds Naylor have to infringe upon your values?

You may wonder, what experience do I have to present these views?  Such chutzpah that I should write this way about an eighty-one  (then sixty) year old woman!  I may be just a precocious kid, but I’ve suffered at the hands of enough poorly-written books that I feel it’s my duty to speak up.

3 thoughts on “Allison the Writer vs. Phyllis Reynolds Naylor: The “Glass Bubble”

  1. Michael Gunter says:

    My compliments and my thanks, Ms. Rose. I’ve known several people who insist that my mother allow us to read utter trash and my personal response to those people quite surprised them. 😉

    Ms. Phyllis Reynolds Naylor, as one of those children who lived a “glass bubble” for most of my life, I’m telling you that you CAN raise your child like that and he will thank you for it. Crudeness, like immorality, is an existing evil, but the “vaccine method” doesn’t work. Germs are also an existing evil, but you don’t force your child to live in a public bathroom in order to “expose” him to diseases.


  2. Lucus Snigg says:

    This is a well-written article, but I feel you are wrong.

    It is true that Phyllis Reynolds Naylor wrote Shiloh with all of its pros and cons and it is also true that “you can’t put your child in a glass bubble and protect him [or her] always.” I feel that it is the parent who should be in charge of when to expose his or her child to the outside world of crudeness and cruelty, which I why I feel you are wrong. You seem to make the point that it is Phyllis Reynolds Naylor who is pushing Shiloh and the world’s horrors upon your child – this is incorrect. Did Phyllis Reynolds Naylor really come to Ms. Perkins’s house and forced the world down Suzie’s throat? No, Ms. Perkin’s did, as it was her decision to do so. Phyllis Reynolds Naylor only gave Ms. Perkins a choice – does Ms. Perkins want to expose Suzie through Shiloh, or through some other horrible means? If you want to blame someone, it is the parent, not Phyllis Reynolds Naylor, for exposing Suzie. You also have no parental jurisdiction over Suzie, since you are not her parent. You can force Ms. Perkins to not expose Suzie. That would be like forcing yourself down Suzie’s throat.

    I have expressed an honest opinion and so have you, and you have done so in the form of a well-written article on a well-written blog. You have a way with words.

    Have a great day!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s